← Search

Ryan Scotting

Grand Junction, CO
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 82W–37L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Ryan Scotting to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
W
2026-08-19 · GJTC HSCOTTING · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Scotting mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-12 · GJTC HSCOTTING · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Scotting mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-05 · GJTC HSCOTTING · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Scotting mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · GJTC HSCOTTING · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Scotting mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-28 · GJTC JWENDT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Wendt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · GJTC HSCOTTING · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Scotting mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · GJTC JWENDT · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · with Keith Decker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Keith Decker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Dan Anderson / Daniel Holmes
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Keith Decker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-07-07 · GJTC JWENDT · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Decker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-30 · GJTC JWENDT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Decker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 51.4% of games
3.5
71.7%
33W–13L · 61.2% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 80.5% of games
7.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 62% of games
7.5mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 50.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
30 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova