← Search

Rachael Kappius

Grand Junction, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 68W–45L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Rachael Kappius to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
W
2026-08-31 · GJTC JAUBERT · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Campbell-Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-27 · GJTC JAUBERT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joely Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · GJTC JAUBERT · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miranda Wagler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-19 · GJTC KDEN · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Braden Kappius mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-08-17 · GJTC JAUBERT · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennie Aubert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · GJTC KDEN · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Richard Plett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · GJTC JAUBERT · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Campbell-Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · GJTC KDEN · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Braden Kappius mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · GJTC JAUBERT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Kay Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-29 · GJTC KDEN · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Braden Kappius mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-28 · GJTC JAUBERT · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Decoursey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-22 · GJTC KDEN · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Braden Kappius mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
100%
13W–0L · 69.6% of games
4.0
57.6%
34W–25L · 54.3% of games
6.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 48% of games
7.5mixed
60%
12W–8L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
23 matches
#1 Singles
12%
14 matches
#1 Female Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal