← Search

Chamaya Hutchens

Washington, DC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 57W–46L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Chamaya Hutchens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
W
2026-07-11 · The NETwork · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-5
L
2026-05-30 · Lady Noon Ballers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kali Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-2
L
2026-05-09 · Lady Noon Ballers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kali Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-5
L
2026-05-03 · Lady Noon Ballers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diem Salmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-3
W
2026-05-02 · NETwork · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kali Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-5
L
2026-04-26 · NETwork · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shay Harris-Pierre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-5
W
2026-04-25 · NETwork · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-04 · NETwork · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kali Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-3
L
2026-04-04 · Lady Noon Ballers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kali Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-02 · The NETwork · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Tobin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-1
L
2026-03-22 · The NETwork · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kali Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-5
L
2026-03-08 · The NETwork · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laurena White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.1% of games
3.0
67.2%
43W–21L · 57.2% of games
3.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 41.7% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.1% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 43.9% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
16 matches
#1 Singles
15%
15 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams