← Search

Lesley Oakes

Lincoln University, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
335 matches · 163W–172L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lesley Oakes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history335 matches
W
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Aliceia Higginbotham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Aliceia Higginbotham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-06 · Senior Smash · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-30 · Senior Smash · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-29 · Volleyatrics · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aliceia Higginbotham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Veronica Fox championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Veronica Fox championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · What's Up · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Dumas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · Volleyatrics · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aliceia Higginbotham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-10 · Senior Smash · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joyce Shiau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · Volleyatrics · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aliceia Higginbotham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-06 · What's Up · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Salsbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
58.6%
75W–53L · 54.1% of games
4.5
20%
2W–8L · 35% of games
7.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 59.2% of games
8.0
32%
8W–17L · 44.7% of games
7.0mixed
43.9%
29W–37L · 49.1% of games
8.0mixed
45.1%
32W–39L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
136 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
106 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
89 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova