← Search

Nicholas Poole

— year-end
48 matches · 38W–10L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Nicholas Poole to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
2026-07-15 · Poole/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yerenia Adame Hernandez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-09 · Poole/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Freeman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · Poole/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Freeman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · Poole/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danele Poole mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-03 · Poole/Alexander/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriel Womack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-04-29 · Poole/Alexander/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gabriel Womack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-1
W
2026-04-26 · Poole/Alexander/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriel Womack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-21 · Poole/Alexander/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randy Rankin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-04-14 · Poole/Alexander/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randy Rankin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-13 · Poole/Alexander/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-02 · Poole/Alexander/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriel Womack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-31 · Poole/Alexander/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriel Womack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 69.8% of games
3.5
80%
12W–3L · 54.3% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.8% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 70.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams