← Search

Gabriel Womack

Little Rock, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 49W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Gabriel Womack to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
James Davenport / Chris Stevens
2026-09-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rick O'Keefe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laza Razafimanjato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-04 · Koplen/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miles Newey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · Brown/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelsy Knox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-23 · Brown/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kaci Vance mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · Poole/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Freeman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
Carter Morris / William Hancock
2026-07-21 · Koplen/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miles Newey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Poole/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danele Poole mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-25 · Poole/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lanie Driver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-6
W
2026-06-24 · Brown/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kaci Vance mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · Poole/Alexander/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicholas Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-04-29 · Poole/Alexander/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
100%
10W–0L · 64.2% of games
3.5
93.8%
15W–1L · 58.4% of games
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.9% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.3% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 50.3% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 55.4% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer