← Search

Christina Islas

SACRAMENTO, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 44W–29L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Christina Islas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · SGV LLW Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SA10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monique Lind
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-27 · SGV LLW Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SA10 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-08 · ROLLINGWOOD 18AW4.0A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-05 · ROLLINGWOOD 18AW4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-14 · ROLLINGWOOD 18AW4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-05 · ROLLINGWOOD 18AW4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-30 · ROLLINGWOOD 18AW4.0A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-22 · ROLLINGWOOD 18AW4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
Michelle Smith / Courtney Zani
2025-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Theona Zhordania championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Monique Lind championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-01-31 · #1 Doubles · with Monique Lind championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.1% of games
4.0
59.5%
25W–17L · 55.7% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.9% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
22 matches
#1 Singles
12%
9 matches
#2 Singles
11%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
6 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams