← Search

Calynn Berry

Bloomfield Hills, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 50W–47L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Calynn Berry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
L
2026-08-31 · FAC-Mellem 6.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Li-Cheng Hsu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-19 · FAC-Mellem 6.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nathan Gudritz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-17 · FAC-Mellem 6.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Li-Cheng Hsu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-10 · FAC-Mellem 6.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Li-Cheng Hsu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
Mark Katakowski / Megan Kahn
2026-08-04 · HAWK-Meyers 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nathan Gudritz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · HAWK-Meyers 18s 6.0X F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nathan Gudritz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-10 · HAWK-Meyers 18s 6.0X F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Craig Marshalek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · WESS-Studier 40s 3.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arielle Gupta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-06 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carlee Meyers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-30 · WESS-Studier 40s 3.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grace Fitzpatrick-Warmbir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 58.5% of games
3.0
64%
16W–9L · 50.2% of games
5.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 61.6% of games
5.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 41.8% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.1% of games
6.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 32.9% of games
5.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 34.7% of games
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 64.4% of games
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
14 matches
#1 Singles
11%
11 matches
#2 Singles
10%
10 matches
#3 Singles
9%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer