← Search

Bonnie Treece

Sylvan Lake, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
149 matches · 106W–43L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Bonnie Treece to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
W
2026-08-31 · WESS-Brown 6.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeff Lacey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-24 · WESS-Brown 6.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarkis Toroyan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-10 · WESS-Brown 6.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarkis Toroyan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-04 · WESS-Brown 18s 6.0X F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Emmanuel Dominguez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-24 · WESS-Brown 18s 6.0X F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Emmanuel Dominguez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · WESS-Brown 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annie Bakken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · WESS-Brown 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Couretas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
Linda Gibbs / Ann Miklas
2026-06-15 · WESS-Brown 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Malin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-12 · WESS-Brown 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eduardo Monsivais mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-01 · WESS-Brown 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · WESS-Brown 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donald Ponder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · with Michael Fleischer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 63.2% of games
3.0
95.5%
21W–1L · 73.1% of games
3.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 46.3% of games
5.5
90%
9W–1L · 68% of games
6.0
80%
8W–2L · 64.5% of games
6.5
60%
6W–4L · 54.8% of games
6.0mixed
75%
18W–6L · 62.6% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
30 matches
#2 Singles
9%
13 matches
#1 Singles
7%
11 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer