← Search

Sloan Dix

— year-end
35 matches · 19W–16L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Sloan Dix to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
W
2026-09-11 · Team 40 Lakewood/Huffman-Patterson W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Burgard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
Corinne Carpenter / Jennifer Evans
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-13 · Lakewood CC/Huffman-Satterwhite W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-02-11 · Lakewood CC/Huffman-Satterwhite W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-02-10 · Lakewood CC/Huffman-Satterwhite W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-06 · Lakewood CC/Huffman-Satterwhite W3.5F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-01-16 · Lakewood CC/Huffman-Satterwhite W3.5F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Straley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-11-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
Teams25 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
58.6%
17W–12L · 54.4% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova