← Search

Kim Holford

— year-end
23 matches · 20W–3L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Kim Holford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
W
2026-09-11 · Team 32 Fretz/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jana Reist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Avery Cording / Melissa Bell
2026-08-22 · Team 11 Jana Reist 6.5W · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Ostrowicki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-20 · Team 11 Jana Reist 6.5W · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amber Newman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-11 · Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Oujezdsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-04 · Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5T · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-26 · Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jana Reist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5T · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-06 · Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jana Reist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-02-20 · Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Oujezdsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-11 · Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5F · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-05 · Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Oujezdsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-01-16 · Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jana Reist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Teams15 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 63.4% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#1 Singles
17%
4 matches
#2 Singles
13%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer