← Search

Leigh Barter

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
256 matches · 192W–64L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Leigh Barter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history256 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Le.Barter18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Liz Arcos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-22 · Le.Barter18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-16 · Me.Golder18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meryl Golder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · Me.Golder18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with KATRINA SIZEMORE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-05 · ACP.Murdock · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sapna Varkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-03 · Jo.Whalen18M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Whalen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · Me.Golder18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jenna Raynor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-01 · Al.Stubbs18T · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meryl Golder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · Le.Barter18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elissa Coughlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-29 · Al.Stubbs18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeme Avent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-27 · Jo.Whalen18M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Istvan Pataki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · Al.Stubbs18T · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with KATRINA SIZEMORE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
89.7%
26W–3L · 75.9% of games
3.5
85.5%
47W–8L · 66% of games
4.0
72%
36W–14L · 58.3% of games
4.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.2% of games
5.0
100%
6W–0L · 60.5% of games
6.5
84%
21W–4L · 67.8% of games
7.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 50.6% of games
8.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.3% of games
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 48.1% of games
4.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
58 matches
#1 Singles
16%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
41 matches
#2 Singles
10%
26 matches
#3 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams