← Search

Jeme Avent

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
445 matches · 297W–148L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeme Avent to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history445 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Ji.Darnell18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hadley Misenheimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · Er.Conigliaro40C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jill Darnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Marianne Jensen / Jennifer Moore
2026-08-28 · Li.Ihly55C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Ostrander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-08-14 · Li.Ihly55C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Ihly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-13 · Ji.Darnell18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Violaine Romans-Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-03 · Er.Conigliaro40C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jill Darnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-29 · Me.Golder18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leigh Barter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-07-22 · Me.Golder18T · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hadley Misenheimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-20 · Tr.Crabtree40T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kana Brinckerhoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-16 · Br.Aron40M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Breazeale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · Cr.Schauman55M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geoff Knight mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · La.Brock40M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Cockayne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams104 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 78.4% of games
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 77.8% of games
3.5
73.3%
22W–8L · 64.2% of games
4.0
68.7%
103W–47L · 57.7% of games
4.5
59.3%
16W–11L · 52.8% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 64.9% of games
6.5
85%
17W–3L · 69.7% of games
7.5
72.5%
29W–11L · 57.6% of games
8.5
57.5%
23W–17L · 52.5% of games
9.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.7% of games
4.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 56.2% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 50.8% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
206 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
116 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
75 matches
#1 Singles
5%
21 matches
#3 Singles
3%
15 matches
#2 Singles
2%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer