← Search

Spencer Mathews

— year-end
53 matches · 42W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Spencer Mathews to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
W
2026-09-08 · McVinney/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andrew Conover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-03 · McVinney/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chris Halket
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-01 · Aguilar/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Will Aguilar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-13 · Shaver/Oyos/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · Shaver/Oyos/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Nelsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · Shaver/Oyos/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Nelsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-04 · Shaver/Oyos/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-27 · Shaver/Oyos/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Nelsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-15 · Glenn/Glenn/Maumelle/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Lynch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-29 · Poole/Alexander/Rebs · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-2
L
2026-04-21 · Poole/Alexander/Rebs · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-13 · Poole/Alexander/Rebs · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Teams17 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 71.1% of games
3.5
73.9%
17W–6L · 60.4% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 51% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 62.2% of games
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 68.6% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 30% of the time
#1 Singles
30%
16 matches
#2 Singles
26%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
4 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova