← Search

Albert Eng

Commerce City, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
224 matches · 173W–51L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Albert Eng to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history224 matches
L
2026-08-27 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thomas DelaFuente
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Rachel Eng championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Troy Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-30 · BP NAVY · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Roselle Morala mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · Colorado/Stiebeling/MX40&Over8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Eng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Huelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-21 · Colorado/Stiebeling/MX40&Over8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Eng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · BP NAVY · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leslie Lane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · Colorado/Stiebeling/MX40&Over8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Eng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-11 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bryan Pivovar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · with Rachel Eng championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-04 · NJ RED · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
83.3%
30W–6L · 63% of games
4.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 42.2% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 62.6% of games
6.5mixed
80%
8W–2L · 58.5% of games
7.0mixed
94.1%
32W–2L · 68.4% of games
7.5mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 63.7% of games
8.0mixed
86.2%
25W–4L · 66.7% of games
8.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 55.2% of games
9.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
52 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer