← Search

Rachel Eng

Commerce City, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
332 matches · 224W–108L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Rachel Eng to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history332 matches
L
2026-08-27 · NJ BLACK · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Carrie Poulsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Leah Vladika championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Shaun Howe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · NJ BLACK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leah Vladika
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jarret Sutphin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-02 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andy MacQueen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
Mieke Scripps / Nicole Reyes
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Kerry Mobley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · NJ BLACK · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Linda Strauss / Sharon Dahlquist
2026-07-28 · NJ YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Kellogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · #3 Doubles · with Meng Lian championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
40%
6W–9L · 49.8% of games
2.5
79.2%
19W–5L · 67.4% of games
3.0
69.2%
63W–28L · 57.9% of games
3.5
65.1%
28W–15L · 56.1% of games
5.5mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 53% of games
6.0mixed
69.6%
16W–7L · 59.2% of games
6.5mixed
72%
18W–7L · 60.1% of games
7.0mixed
87.5%
21W–3L · 65.1% of games
7.5mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.8% of games
8.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 67.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
107 matches
#1 Singles
21%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
65 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
13 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe