← Search

Doris Tomko

Aurora, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 115W–56L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Doris Tomko to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
W
2026-07-16 · A55 6.0W LT1 Burgess · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Lowery-O'Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-15 · A18 3.0W LT2 Tomko · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elyse Kemmerline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-14 · A65 6.0W LT Grasgreen DeLamatre · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deb Rutzky
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · A55 6.0W LT1 Burgess · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maureen Banas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-08 · A18 3.0W LT2 Tomko · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sloane Burgess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-07 · A65 6.0W LT Grasgreen DeLamatre · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deb Rutzky
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-06 · A40 3.0W LT Sirak · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Serdinak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-01 · A18 3.0W LT2 Tomko · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sloane Burgess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-24 · A18 3.0W LT2 Tomko · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elyse Kemmerline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · A65 6.0W LT Grasgreen DeLamatre · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Myra Lakin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · A55 6.0W LT1 Burgess · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Lowery-O'Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · A18 3.0W LT2 Tomko · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Sly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
68%
51W–24L · 57.9% of games
5.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.3% of games
6.0
70.5%
43W–18L · 57.8% of games
6.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 56.9% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
13 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe