← Search

Janel Ciolli

Copley, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
240 matches · 108W–132L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janel Ciolli to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history240 matches
L
2026-07-23 · A55 6.0W TP1 Coon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nora McClaren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · A55 6.0W TP1 Coon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carrie Koran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · A18 3.0W TP1 Ciolli · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Voris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-30 · A65 6.0W TP Coon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joie Matousek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-18 · A55 6.0W TP1 Coon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Fran Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · A18 3.0W TP1 Ciolli · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kirstin Berkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-11 · A55 6.0W TP1 Coon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ruth Meadows
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · A65 6.0W TP Coon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joie Matousek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · X18 6.0 TP1 Dean · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Lambright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-02 · A65 6.0W TP Coon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Meg Stanton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-27 · A18 3.0W TP1 Ciolli · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Voris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-20 · A18 3.0W TP1 Ciolli · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Voris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
51.9%
42W–39L · 49.2% of games
3.5
10%
3W–27L · 38.6% of games
6.0
52.6%
20W–18L · 51.2% of games
6.5
31.6%
6W–13L · 41.1% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
54.3%
25W–21L · 50.6% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
42.9%
9W–12L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
110 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
50 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams