← Search

Dan Campos

Colorado Springs, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 109W–83L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Dan Campos to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history192 matches
W
2026-08-25 · CSRC GAYDOS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-23 · CSRC PECK · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tracy Glaser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-18 · CSRC GAYDOS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Ngo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-11 · CSRC GAYDOS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-09 · CSRC REYNOLDS · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Judith Ertel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · CSRC GAYDOS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Thornton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-02 · CSRC PECK · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kady Hommel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-26 · CSRC REYNOLDS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Judith Ertel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-12 · CSRC REYNOLDS · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Judith Ertel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Paul Gustafson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Paul Gustafson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-07 · CSRC BARKER · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
50%
28W–28L · 48% of games
3.5
46.2%
12W–14L · 50% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 44.3% of games
6.0mixed
74.2%
23W–8L · 59.8% of games
6.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 59.3% of games
7.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 57% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
43 matches
#1 Singles
17%
32 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe