← Search

Kady Hommel

Colorado Springs, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
204 matches · 107W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kady Hommel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history204 matches
W
2026-08-31 · CSRC MCPHERSON · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Rhoten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-17 · CSRC MCPHERSON · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Whisenant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-16 · CSRC PECK · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Palazzo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · MEMPK HILTON · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cody Hoggatt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-09 · CSRC PECK · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jason Gonzales mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-09 · MEMPK HILTON · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matthew Kiser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-03 · CSRC MCPHERSON · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Banet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · CSRC PECK · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dan Campos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-02 · MEMPK HILTON · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matthew Kiser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-26 · CSRC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori McPherson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-25 · CSRC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Molek-Otto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-25 · CSRC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cynthia MacE Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
59.3%
54W–37L · 53.6% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
57.9%
22W–16L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 67.6% of games
7.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 52.3% of games
8.0mixed
41.7%
20W–28L · 48% of games
8.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 39% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
55 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert