Hilary Fife
Glen Ellyn, IL
180 matches · 110W–70L · seasons 2021–2026
Captains: add Hilary Fife to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history180 matches
L
Lindsay Freeman / Jennifer Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-5, 1-0
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-5
L
Jennifer Shields / Marilyn Tansey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 6.Tam Lund Sat 3 $25
CHI E 40W4.0 1.Tam Lund Sun 1 $25
NITA E 40W40g Courts Plus-Trout/Peterson
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 2Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 8Tam Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA E M40&O8.0 3RT Lam2 Sat 2 $27
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 1.Tam Lund Tue 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 2.Tam Lund Thu 7 $22
CDTA S TriWMid 8.Gnvw Baltazar Tue 7 $21
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 4.Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 5.Tam Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W TriWMid 3.Gnvw Baltazaar Sat 3 $21
NITA E 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA E 40W40b Courts Plus-Trout/Peterson
NITA S 40W18e TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA S 75WCf Wheaton-LaBue/Reese
NITA W 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 40W40c Courts Plus-Trout/Peterson
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
61.7%
29W–18L · 55.7% of games
4.0
63.6%
42W–24L · 57.3% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.1% of games
7.5
48.3%
14W–15L · 50.7% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 33.3% of games
8.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
54 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.