← Search

Stephen Diehl

— year-end
84 matches · 46W–38L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Stephen Diehl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-08-07 · KY/LOU/MCGLONE/RUSSELL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Holthouser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-15 · KY/LOU/McGlone · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Billy McGlone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-09 · KY/LOU/McGlone · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Belva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · KY/LOU/MCGLONE/RUSSELL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Holthouser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · KY/LOU/McGlone · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gibbon Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-03 · KY/LOU/DIEHL/MCGLONE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Wilkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · KY/LOU/DIEHL/MCGLONE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Keehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · KY/LOU/DIEHL/MCGLONE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elijah Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-02-21 · KY/LOU/THOMPSON/HOMMRICH · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Birkby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-24 · KY/LOU/THOMPSON/HOMMRICH · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gene Snowden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-01-18 · KY/LOU/THOMPSON/HOMMRICH · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-14 · KY/LOU/DIEHL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Bunnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 59.1% of games
3.5
44.1%
15W–19L · 47.6% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 30.1% of games
6.5
50%
5W–5L · 48.8% of games
3.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54% of games
3.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 56% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
24 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer