← Search

Lisa Smallwood

— year-end
148 matches · 109W–39L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Lisa Smallwood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history148 matches
W
2026-08-12 · Smallwood/LF/tri 4.0 W DAY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Faith Beeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · Smith/LF/4.5 W tri · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jodi Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · Smallwood/LF/tri 4.0 W DAY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelli Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-20 · Smith/LF/4.5 W tri · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Snapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-15 · Smith/LF/4.5 W tri · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Barnard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-13 · Smallwood/LF/tri 4.0 W DAY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alyssa Andrew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-19 · Tulsa Night/Wilson/LF/4.0W · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-14 · Tulsa Night/Wilson/LF/4.0W · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-29 · Tulsa Night/Wilson/LF/4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Durborow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-23 · Tulsa Night/Wilson/LF/4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-04-15 · Tulsa Night/Wilson/LF/4.0W · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-06 · Tulsa Night/Wilson/LF/4.0W · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
Teams36 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 67.5% of games
3.0
79.5%
35W–9L · 60% of games
3.5
80%
32W–8L · 59.7% of games
4.0
64.6%
31W–17L · 57.5% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 33.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
36 matches
#1 Singles
21%
31 matches
#2 Singles
12%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe