← Search

Stacy Teague

— year-end
137 matches · 94W–43L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Stacy Teague to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history137 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Devinney/GR/Day3.5 W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Hendrickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-01 · Devinney/GR/Day3.5 W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blair Schluter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-20 · Smith/LF/4.5 W tri · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amy Slade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · McCants/LF/tri 4.0 DAY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Hendrickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · McCants/LF/tri 4.0 DAY · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Blair Schluter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-2
L
2026-08-07 · McCants/LF/tri 4.0 DAY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angie Juarez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-06 · Schluter/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Beth Scruggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-30 · Smith/LF/4.5 W tri · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carol Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-23 · Schluter/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Blair Schluter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-07-22 · McCants/LF/tri 4.0 DAY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Hendrickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-20 · Smith/LF/4.5 W tri · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carol Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · McCants/LF/tri 4.0 DAY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angie Juarez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams39 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
69.8%
30W–13L · 57% of games
3.0
71%
22W–9L · 59.4% of games
3.5
57.1%
20W–15L · 52.3% of games
5.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 57.5% of games
6.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 66% of games
7.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
38 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal