← Search

Mike Cicatiello

— year-end
24 matches · 8W–16L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Mike Cicatiello to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2026-04-28 · Greer/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-22 · Colucci-Gagliardo/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brendan Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-04-19 · Letts-Fitzpatrick/Rogers/SVCC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Daglow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-18 · Greer/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Hinkebein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-10 · Greer/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Hoehner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-03-14 · Greer/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Matthew Gross / Tom Hubbard
2026-03-07 · Colucci-Gagliardo/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Hultquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-03 · Greer/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clay Fecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-28 · Colucci-Gagliardo/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brendan Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-19 · Letts-Fitzpatrick/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brendan Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deanna Cicatiello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
Steve Finney / Kelly Johnson
2025-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judith Cicatiello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 51% of games
3.5
10%
1W–9L · 32% of games
3.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 54% of the time
#3 Doubles
54%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer