← Search

Jay Thomas

Hillsborough, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 53W–58L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jay Thomas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-07-01 · Baseliners · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-2
W
2026-05-03 · Baseliners · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-26 · Baseliners · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-22 · Worry About Crushing · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ousseynou Khoussa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-19 · Baseliners · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-2
L
2026-03-07 · Worry About Crushing · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cliff Kao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-05 · Baseliners · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-02-27 · Worry About Crushing · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cliff Kao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
Michael Lee
2026-01-18 · Baseliners · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-15 · Baseliners · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thulasiraja Kandaswamy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-4
L
2025-11-16 · Baseliners · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thulasiraja Kandaswamy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-4
W
2025-11-13 · Baseliners · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thulasiraja Kandaswamy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
71.8%
28W–11L · 59% of games
4.0
30.9%
17W–38L · 43.6% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
14 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal