← Search

Harshavardhan Dharkar

Princeton Junction, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 72W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Harshavardhan Dharkar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Dennis Fernandes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Dennis Fernandes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Dennis Fernandes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madhu Talupur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with AUSTIN KIM
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-21 · NJ: Jersey Strikers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mithun C S
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · CM Hackers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gopal Thirukallam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-14 · NJ: Jersey Strikers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mithun C S
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-13 · CM Hackers · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-17 · CM Hackers · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · NJ: Jersey Strikers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Smejkal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-09 · CM Hackers · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 52.1% of games
4.0
53.4%
62W–54L · 51.6% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 32.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
60 matches
#1 Singles
21%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
22 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe