← Search

Emily Janz

Birmingham, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 22W–40L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Emily Janz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2026-08-11 · BHAMCC-Strachan 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Janz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-04 · BHAMCC-Strachan 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Janz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
Terry Hammer / Lisa Kozerski
2026-07-14 · FAC-Nix 40s 3.5 DW F1 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-01 · FAC-Presser 40s 3.0 DW F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanee Radner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-29 · BHAMCC-Strachan 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Janz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-27 · BHAMCC-Lehman 18s 3.5 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kalee Georgescu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · BHAMCC- Jardine 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly LaBarre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-11 · FAC-Presser 40s 3.0 DW F1 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
Sean O'Brien / Monica Green
2025-08-19 · 5BCC-STRACHAN 70MIX 18&O SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Janz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-08-12 · 5BCC-STRACHAN 70MIX 18&O SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Janz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-06-10 · 3BCC-LEHMAN 35NW WE 18&O SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Dobronos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-09 · 2FAC-PRESSER 30DW MO 40&O SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Goldberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
45.5%
15W–18L · 51% of games
3.5
7.7%
1W–12L · 33.3% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe