← Search

Monica Green

Troy, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
165 matches · 92W–73L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Monica Green to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history165 matches
W
2026-08-31 · BOH-Vondell 6.5 Combo Mix · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gustavo Myers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 2-3
W
2026-08-26 · BOH-Vondell 6.5 Combo Mix · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Adel Wahab mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · BOH-Vondell 6.5 Combo Mix · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Ranta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-10 · WESS-Brown 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Berry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-07 · TROY-Shanbrom 40s 3.5 DW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin MacLeish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-29 · TROY-Shier 40s 3.5 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Lambrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-26 · WESS-Brown 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rajendra Shekhawat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · BT- Novotny 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle O'Neill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · BHC-Moore 18s 3.5 DW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin MacLeish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · TROY-Shier 40s 3.5 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Flynn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-11 · BHC-Moore 18s 3.5 DW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Lambrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · TROY-Jackson 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Krauss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.6% of games
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 64% of games
3.0
76.9%
20W–6L · 60.2% of games
3.5
47.1%
33W–37L · 50.2% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 60.8% of games
6.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 48.4% of games
6.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 61.1% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
42 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
11 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova