← Search

Sara Ray

— year-end
216 matches · 103W–113L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Sara Ray to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history216 matches
L
2026-08-04 · Racquet Rockets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alena Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · Racquet Rockets · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alena Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · Racquet Rockets · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yoko Walljasper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · Racquet Rockets · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yoko Walljasper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-12 · Gladiatrix · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Bryce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-28 · Gladiatrix · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Ewing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-21 · Gladiatrix · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Law
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-22 · Liberty Park-Leikin/Stacey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Connelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-08 · Liberty Park-Leikin/Stacey · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace Geer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-5, 1-0
L
2025-11-01 · Liberty Park-Leikin/Stacey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Massae Sato MacIunas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-10-04 · Liberty Park-Leikin/Stacey · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Ewing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-13 · Liberty Park-Leikin/Stacey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Bourke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Teams57 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.4% of games
3.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 59.4% of games
3.5
48.3%
42W–45L · 52.1% of games
4.0
21.7%
10W–36L · 41.3% of games
6.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 53.9% of games
6.5mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 56.6% of games
7.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 42.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
87 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
51 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer