← Search

Lisa Bradshaw

— year-end
22 matches · 7W–15L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Lisa Bradshaw to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Eagleridge-Dato/Johnson · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-03 · Tri-to-Fly · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aubrey Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · Tri-to-Fly · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Schanz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-27 · Eagleridge-Dato · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shawn Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-06 · Eagleridge-Dato · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-08 · Eagleridge-Dato · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-17 · Eagleridge Ladies-Dato/Nelson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marianne Kimball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2025-12-10 · Eagleridge Ladies-Dato/Nelson · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-22 · 21 Athletics-Dato/Nelson · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Heather Schanz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-09-08 · 21 Athletics-Dato/Nelson · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-08-25 · 21 Athletics-Dato/Nelson · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Rachel Dato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-07-14 · 21 Athletics-Dato · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Teams10 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 60.6% of games
3.0
13.3%
2W–13L · 27.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
7 matches
#1 Singles
27%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
3 matches
#2 Singles
9%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer