← Search

Rachel Dato

— year-end
32 matches · 15W–17L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Rachel Dato to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Eagleridge-Dato/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimmi Rea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-02 · Eagleridge-Dato/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shawn Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-10 · Tri-to-Fly · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Heather Schanz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-03 · Tri-to-Fly · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shannon Knudsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · Tri-to-Fly · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shawn Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-27 · Eagleridge-Dato · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimmi Rea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-29 · Eagleridge-Dato · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-04-22 · Eagleridge-Dato · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-15 · Eagleridge-Dato · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimmi Rea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-04 · Eagleridge-Dato/Nelson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Schanz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-02-25 · Eagleridge-Dato/Nelson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Schanz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-18 · Eagleridge-Dato/Nelson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimmi Rea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 54% of games
3.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
7 matches
#1 Singles
19%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova