← Search

Jared Jeffers

LEXINGTON, KY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 14W–26L · seasons 2023–2025

Captains: add Jared Jeffers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2025-12-14 · KY/LEX/Shah · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Igor Cunha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-09-28 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gene Hilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-09-20 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Doug Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-09-16 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gene Hilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-02 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-08-20 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Doug Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-15 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-06-24 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-19 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-09 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-12 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Jude
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-02-08 · KY/LEX/Ingram · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Jude
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 46.8% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.8% of games
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 51.2% of games
6.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.2% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
16 matches
#1 Singles
20%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
5 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova