← Search

Nicki Spang

— year-end
47 matches · 31W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Nicki Spang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
W
2026-09-14 · TRicks (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lindsey Pond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-11 · AMilas (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-04 · AMilas (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Diana Blocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · TRicks (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Miars
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · AMilas (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susie Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-10 · TRicks (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Miars
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-07-10 · LHackworth (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Hackworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · LPackman/ATroxell (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lauren Packman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-22 · LPackman/ATroxell (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alyse Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-15 · LPackman/ATroxell (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amber Troxell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Elizabeth Miars championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-12 · LHackworth (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jimena Lozano de Bermudez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Teams15 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.5% of games
3.0
66.7%
16W–8L · 57.1% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 62.4% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#1 Singles
9%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe