← Search

Chandler Fox

Falls Church, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 63W–60L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Chandler Fox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
W
2026-08-02 · Team 2 Ageless All Stars · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John H
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-3
W
2026-07-27 · Team 2 Ageless All Stars · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Zavilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · Team 1 Ageless All Stars · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robert Etheridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · Team 1 Ageless All Stars · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Benjamin Utech
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-17 · Team 2 Ageless All Stars · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ted Berner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-13 · Team 1 Ageless All Stars · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Zavilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · Team 2 Ageless All Stars · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ronnie Hamad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-16 · Team 1 Ageless All Stars · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ted Berner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-07 · Team 7 Ageless All Stars · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryan Daguiar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · Team 1 Ageless All Stars · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Zott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-3
L
2026-05-31 · Team 7 Ageless All Stars · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-19 · Team 4 NOVA All Stars · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Tisch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
42.4%
28W–38L · 48.7% of games
6.0
75%
21W–7L · 60.4% of games
6.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 52.1% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
20 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert