← Search

Asma Shah

Fairfax, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 38W–38L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Asma Shah to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Lina Saliba championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Jill Adler / Jill White
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Stephanie Fultz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
Kindra Kirkeby / Mandy Miller
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Hiam Eljazzar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-25 · Team 13 Causing a Racquet 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hiam Eljazzar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-20 · Team 13 Causing a Racquet 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynnita Montague-Daddio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-13 · Team 10 Causing a Racquet 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Fultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-12 · Team 13 Causing a Racquet 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lina Saliba
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-07 · Team 13 Worldgate · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Clarke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-5
W
2026-06-06 · Team 5 Match Makers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Saif Al Hussaini mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-05 · Team 13 Worldgate · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-4
W
2026-05-29 · Team 13 Worldgate · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · Team 5 Match Makers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Redha Hasan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 44.3% of games
3.0
79.4%
27W–7L · 61.1% of games
3.5
17.6%
3W–14L · 38.2% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 32% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
16 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova