← Search

Mary Margaret Guzik

— year-end
14 matches · 10W–4L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Mary Margaret Guzik to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Sanford/Perry/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sue Anne Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-13 · Sanford/Perry/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sue Anne Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-11 · Sanford/Perry/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brenda Maddaleni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-28 · Sanford/Perry/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sue Anne Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · Perry/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Anne Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · Perry/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Anne Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-01-15 · Piedmont Park (Sarah Kim)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 6-1
W
Mary Nelson / Alice Obrien
2025-12-13 · Piedmont Park (Sarah Kim)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-12-06 · Piedmont Park (Sarah Kim)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lacey Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-11-22 · Piedmont Park (Sarah Kim)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Roman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-15 · Piedmont Park (Sarah Kim)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abigail Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-07-13 · Piedmont Park (Lacey Cooper)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Umnia Mahgoub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Teams7 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
70%
7W–3L · 51.7% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
21%
3 matches
#1 Singles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer