← Search

Sue Anne Perry

— year-end
96 matches · 51W–45L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sue Anne Perry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
L
Stephanie Nelson / Elizabeth Broome
2026-09-09 · Palk/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tara Reidy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-02 · Palk/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tanya Capeling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-01 · Sanford/Perry/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Margaret Guzik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Emily Walker / Keri Cowles
2026-08-26 · Palk/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tanya Capeling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · Blevins/Thomas/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stacy Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · Sanford/Perry/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Margaret Guzik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-28 · Sanford/Perry/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Margaret Guzik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-19 · Blevins/Thomas/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stacy Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-18 · Perry/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Margaret Guzik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · Palk/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristie Skoda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · Perry/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Margaret Guzik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-24 · Palk/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Palk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Teams55 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
70.5%
31W–13L · 57.4% of games
4.0
30.4%
7W–16L · 41.3% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.9% of games
7.5
40%
8W–12L · 45% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 24% of the time
#2 Doubles
24%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
22 matches
#1 Singles
23%
22 matches
#2 Singles
16%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert