← Search

Collin Cahill

Little Rock, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 45W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Collin Cahill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-09-03 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with George Rainey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · Aguilar/LR/Reb · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Parker Padgett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · Shaver/Oyos/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miles Newey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · Shaver/Oyos/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Reymond Koplen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-20 · Nelsen/Glenn/NLR/BP · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelby Fisher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-14 · Shaver/Oyos/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Nelsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-2
L
2026-06-15 · Glenn/Glenn/Maumelle/BP · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carley Glenn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-09 · Glenn/Glenn/Maumelle/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carley Glenn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-29 · Poole/Alexander/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miles Newey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-2
W
2026-04-26 · Poole/Alexander/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with CJ Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-21 · Poole/Alexander/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Newey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-13 · Poole/Alexander/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with CJ Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 63.6% of games
3.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 55% of games
4.0
80%
4W–1L · 48.4% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 59% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 68.3% of games
3.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.5% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer