← Search

Jacob McIlwain

Waynesboro, MS
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 12W–15L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jacob McIlwain to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
W
2026-04-26 · Sumrall 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-19 · Sumrall 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terence Payne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · Sumrall 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stewart Gammill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-22 · Sumrall 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Pratt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-07-22 · McCoy, Landon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madison Mahaffey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-16 · Kimble, Paul · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Tam Nguyen / Brice Till
2024-06-19 · Kimble, Paul · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Kimble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2024-06-11 · McCoy, Landon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Landon McCoy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2024-05-22 · Kimble, Paul · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2024-03-21 · Howell, Bryan · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-03-14 · Howell, Bryan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Cialone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-02-15 · Howell, Bryan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Cialone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 52.7% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
5 matches
#1 Singles
11%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams