← Search

Robert Langley

— year-end
59 matches · 33W–26L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Robert Langley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-08-24 · Burbank/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Butorac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · Burbank/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael McKenna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-10 · Neal/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Steinhausler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-20 · Yen/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diego Hijano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-24 · Yen/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cade Benedict
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-15 · Yen/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandon Brackett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
David Collins / John Watson
2026-03-29 · Yen/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diego Hijano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Michael Malone / Stephen Lewis
2026-03-01 · Yen/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with BALAJI KRISHNAIAH
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-11-01 · McKenna/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael McKenna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-10-29 · Yen/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aldell Gamble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-10-28 · McKenna/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-10-22 · McKenna/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ludovic Bruneau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
Teams27 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 56% of games
4.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 51.8% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.5% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
14 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer