← Search

BALAJI KRISHNAIAH

Memphis, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 66W–27L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add BALAJI KRISHNAIAH to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Malone/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Trip Wills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-08-30 · Johnson/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kevin Womack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-23 · Johnson/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hunter Ivy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · Johnson/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-02 · Richards/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Henry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-26 · McCalla/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dana Bray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-27 · Brown/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Johnston Tayloe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · McCalla/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathy Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Neal Patel / Savannah Nagle
2026-06-07 · Richards/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Latasha Echols mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-02 · Lewis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Butorac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-01 · Todd/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tim Whitehorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-30 · Lewis/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keith Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
91.4%
32W–3L · 71.7% of games
4.0
59.3%
16W–11L · 54.5% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 38.9% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 56% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 83.3% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
18 matches
#1 Singles
10%
9 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert