← Search

Brett Tanaka

Fishers, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 53W–34L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Brett Tanaka to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
Kristin Schmidt / Brennan Perkins
2026-07-31 · Indy X18 7.0X CRC Kim · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tamara Kafka mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-20 · Indy A18 3.5M IRCD Singh · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-0
W
Michael Clark / Anne Nevitt
2026-07-17 · Indy X18 7.0X CRC Kim · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Taeko Escasa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · Indy A18 3.5M IRCD Singh · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-09 · Indy A18 4.0M CRC Koval · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Copeland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-5, 1-0
W
Velrajan Ramasamy
2026-07-06 · Indy A18 3.5M IRCD Singh · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-1
W
2026-06-29 · Indy A18 3.5M IRCD Singh · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · Indy X18 7.0X CRC Kim · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Slowikowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-22 · Indy A18 3.5M IRCD Singh · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · Indy A18 4.0M CRC Koval · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Copeland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-15 · Indy A18 3.5M IRCD Singh · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · Indy A18 4.0M CRC Koval · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
63.6%
28W–16L · 58% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.7% of games
7.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.1% of games
8.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 53.7% of games
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 61.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#2 Singles
9%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer