← Search

Sarah Vandekerckhove

— year-end
17 matches · 7W–10L · seasons 2024–2025

Captains: add Sarah Vandekerckhove to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
W
2025-07-20 · CP: Over Served:Brown/Masters · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anna Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-06-25 · CP:Q Over Served:Brown/Masters · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-06-21 · CP:Q Over Served:Brown/Masters · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-18 · CP:Q Over Served:Brown/Masters · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-06-05 · CP: Over Served:Brown/Masters · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ingrid Sarver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-06-04 · CP:Q Over Served:Brown/Masters · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-11 · CP:Over Served:Brown · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Vandekerckhove mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-28 · CP:Over Served:Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Vandekerckhove mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-03-23 · CP: Over Served:Brown/Masters · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ingrid Sarver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-02-28 · CP:Over Served:Brown/Masters · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-01-29 · CP:Over Served:Brown/Masters · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-4
W
2024-12-18 · CP:Over Served:Brown/Masters · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams6 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 45.2% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
8 matches
#1 Singles
29%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe