← Search

Mary Alyce Kaetzel

— year-end
63 matches · 32W–31L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Mary Alyce Kaetzel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Team 3 McKinney/Pike-Cady W4.0F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jana Ricker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · McKinney/Pike-Cady W4.0T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jana Ricker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-06 · High Point/Ethington W4.0S · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Sharon Naukam / Anne Smith
2026-06-04 · McKinney/Pike-Cady W4.0T · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michaela Cady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-23 · High Point/Ethington W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Sekhon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · McKinney/Pike-Cady W4.0T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jana Ricker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-08 · McKinney/Pike-Cady W4.0T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jana Ricker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-07 · McKinney/Pike-Cady W4.0T · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jana Ricker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · High Point/Ethington W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurel White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
Jennifer Jacobs / Katheryn Ross
2026-03-08 · Fretz/Pike-Cady W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristin Pike
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-06 · McKinney/Pike-Cady W4.0F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paola Gerber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-03-01 · Fretz/Pike-Cady W4.0S · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristin Pike
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Teams43 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
49.2%
30W–31L · 49.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#1 Singles
19%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova