← Search

Roz Johnson

— year-end
48 matches · 26W–22L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Roz Johnson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
2026-06-20 · Love Hurts · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Fischer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
Laura Kane / Corrie Halladay
2026-06-13 · Love Hurts · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Malena Maiz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-28 · Smartaces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anagha Vasudevan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-09 · Love Hurts · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Isenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Smartaces · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Corrie Halladay / Laura Kane
2026-05-02 · Love Hurts · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Railey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-23 · Smartaces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Rothwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-18 · Love Hurts · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-28 · Love Hurts · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-02-26 · Smartaces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Railey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-15 · Smartaces · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keri Hutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-02-12 · Smartaces · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Railey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Teams7 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
60%
6W–4L · 60.7% of games
3.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 56.5% of games
3.5
30%
3W–7L · 38.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
15 matches
#1 Singles
29%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
7 matches
#2 Singles
13%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer