← Search

Sarah Railey

— year-end
59 matches · 38W–21L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Sarah Railey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-06-27 · Love Hurts · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelby Loskorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · Smartaces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Isenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · Love Hurts · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-06 · Love Hurts · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · Smartaces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Fuchs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-16 · Love Hurts · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-09 · Love Hurts · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Corrie Halladay / Laura Kane
2026-05-02 · Love Hurts · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roz Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-18 · Love Hurts · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-02-26 · Smartaces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roz Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-21 · Love Hurts · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Malena Maiz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-02-14 · Love Hurts · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams8 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
76.2%
16W–5L · 63.9% of games
3.0
70%
21W–9L · 58.4% of games
3.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
23 matches
#1 Singles
27%
16 matches
#2 Singles
10%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer