← Search

Edie Newell

Melbourne, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
238 matches · 160W–78L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Edie Newell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history238 matches
W
2026-08-28 · Kiwanis Ball Slappers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Santana Luis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Sherri Kidder championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-16 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Sherri Kidder championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
Sherri Miller
2026-08-15 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-14 · Kiwanis Ball Slappers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Santana Luis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Kelly Sabel / Cynthia Simmons
2026-08-11 · Viera Regional Park - Newell · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandy Dahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · Viera Regional Park - Newell · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cheri McLachlan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · with Nicole Bertran championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · with Elizabeth Shannon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Nicole Bertran championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
20%
1W–4L · 35.6% of games
3.5
77.8%
56W–16L · 60.6% of games
4.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 50.2% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 69.2% of games
7.5
71.1%
27W–11L · 59.7% of games
8.0
100%
9W–0L · 63.3% of games
7.0mixed
80%
28W–7L · 64.2% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
52 matches
#1 Singles
14%
33 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal