← Search

Cheri McLachlan

MELBOURNE, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
314 matches · 171W–143L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cheri McLachlan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history314 matches
L
2026-09-11 · EFSC - McLachlan · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Susan Kontos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-10 · Viera Regional Park - Newell · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandy Dahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · EFSC - McLachlan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · Viera Regional Park - Newell · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Edie Newell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-23 · Westwind - Newell · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sherri Kidder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · Westwind - Newell · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Edie Newell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Bridgewater - Newell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick McGuigan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-22 · EFSC - McLachlan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Lutian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-18 · Westwind - Newell · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sherri Kidder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-04 · Westwind - Newell · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sherri Kidder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-27 · EFSC - McLachlan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Naomi Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-19 · Bridgewater - Newell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Hopkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 59% of games
3.5
70.7%
53W–22L · 58.7% of games
4.0
41.9%
31W–43L · 46.5% of games
6.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 57.1% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
31.8%
7W–15L · 43.8% of games
8.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 46.7% of games
8.5
50%
7W–7L · 45.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 53.9% of games
8.0mixed
52.2%
12W–11L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
110 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
94 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
68 matches
#1 Singles
10%
30 matches
#2 Singles
4%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal