← Search

Christine Silva

Brick, NJ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 46W–55L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Christine Silva to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
W
2026-03-07 · Playoff/Nassau Hot Shots · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Mullen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W
Maureen Edwards / Robert Kuttner
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christopher Bautista mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-02-21 · Playoff/Nassau Hot Shots · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Fafian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-01-09 · Racquet Scientists · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Palazzo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6
W
2026-01-03 · Playoff/Nassau Hot Shots · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Fafian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-06 · Playoff/Nassau Hot Shots · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Fafian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-12-05 · Racquet Scientists · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Sugrue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-11-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jamie Provenzano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-08 · Playoff/Nassau Hot Shots · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Fafian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jamie Provenzano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-31 · Racquet Scientists · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Palazzo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-10-25 · Playoff/Nassau Hot Shots · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Fafian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
46.4%
45W–52L · 46.9% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
24 matches
#1 Singles
16%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe